.
Political System of NORTH KOREA AND SOUTH KOREA
........................
The political system of North Korea and South Korea is in stark contrast to their neighbors, as the former has a two-party system while the latter has a single-party system. Although they are both authoritarian countries, their social systems are vastly different. In this article, we will explore the reasons for these differences and how they affect daily life.
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un – who took over power from his father, Kim Il Sung in late 2011 following a failed coup against his brother, Kim Jong Il – has consolidated power through increasing control over key sectors of the economy and exerting greater control over the military. His policies have been characterized by harshness, isolationism, and brutality. He has also strengthened alliances with China and Russia and maintained close ties with Iran and Syria.
North Korea’s constitution, which was drafted under a totalitarian regime, defines the country’s supreme leader as “a supreme national personality with divine dignity who lives above the entire world, with an aim of establishing peace and prosperity on Earth and beyond.” The Supreme Leader serves as head of state, but he also enjoys considerable influence within the government and industry. A five-year term is required before being allowed to run for office, and the country is currently ruled by one elected president who was first elected in 2018. However, the current presidency has been doggedly criticized for its human rights record and corruption, as well as poor governance.
The economic system of North Korea is similar to that of its neighbor. It is heavily dependent on exports to China and the U.S., making it vulnerable to sanctions or international trade restrictions. Despite recent improvement in ties with the United States, it remains a major importer of goods such as coal and rare earth metals, as well as high-tech products like semiconductors. Additionally, North Korea faces challenges stemming from ongoing tensions with the United States and other countries due to disagreements over Taiwan, the status of Korean Peninsula, and the issue of unification.
South Korean President Moon Jae-In – who took over after his predecessor, President Roh Moo-hyun, passed away in June 2017, following a series of controversial impeachments – has made efforts to restore stability and stability in the country. After passing laws to prevent protests and crackdowns, Moon enacted a new Constitution that established the separation of powers, gave all branches of power equal authority, and guaranteed freedom of expression and association. Critics argue that the change in leadership has not done enough to address issues of racial inequality or environmental degradation.
Although both countries have authoritarian governments and rigid rules of law, their societies differ greatly. While North Korea is highly hierarchical and strict, South Korea is more egalitarian and open. Furthermore, there is little tolerance for dissent in North Korea, whereas there is much more tolerance in South Korea. This difference can be seen in everyday interactions, where people are expected to abide by strict codes of conduct or face consequences for violating them.
Despite some similarities in their governing systems, North Korea and South Korea are very different places. Their governments are both dictatorial; however, their societies are vastly different. Unlike North Korea, the South Korean society is more open, tolerant, and generally appreciative of diversity. As a result, relationships between citizens are far more diverse and enriching than those in North Korea, which tend to cluster towards ethnic groups, religion, and nationality.
In conclusion, the political systems of North Korea and South Korea are stark contrasts to their neighbors. Both countries have authoritarian governments that restrict free speech and freedom of association, resulting in a closed society that favors conformity and order. As a result, they are highly regulated, and many of their customs, traditions, and values may be considered repugnant by outsiders. Their environments are both hostile and inhospitable to foreigners, including refugees, who often find themselves isolated or persecuted.
Comments
Post a Comment